European Society for Surgery of the Shoulder and Elbow (SECEC) rotator cuff tear registry Delphi consensus.

Background: The purpose of this study was to establish consensus statements via a Delphi process on the factors that should be included in a registry for those patients undergoing rotator cuff tear treatment. Methods: A consensus process on the treatment of rotator cuff utilizing a modified Delphi technique was conducted. Fifty-seven surgeons completed these consensus statements and 9 surgeons declined. The participants were members of the European Society for Surgery of the Shoulder and Elbow committees representing 23 European countries. Thirteen questions were generated regarding the diagnosis and follow-up of rotator cuff tears were distributed, with 3 rounds of questionnaires and final voting occurring. Consensus was defined as achieving 80%-89% agreement, whereas strong consensus was defined as 90%-99% agreement, and unanimous consensus was defined by 100% agreement with a proposed statement. Results: Of the 13 total questions and consensus statements on rotator cuff tears, 1 achieved unanimous consensus, 6 achieved strong consensus, 5 achieved consensus, and 1 did not achieve consensus. The statement that reached unanimous consensus was that the factors in the patient history that should be evaluated and recorded in the setting of suspected/known rotator cuff tear are age, gender, comorbidities, smoking, traumatic etiology, prior treatment including physical therapy/injections, pain, sleep disturbance, sports, occupation, workmen's compensation, hand dominance, and functional limitations. The statement that did not achieve consensus was related to the role of ultrasound in the initial diagnosis of patients with rotator cuff tears. Conclusion: Nearly all questions reached consensus among 57 European Society for Surgery of the Shoulder and Elbow members representing 23 different European countries. We encourage surgeons to use this minimum set of variables to establish rotator cuff registries and multicenter studies. By adapting and using compatible variables, data can more easily be compared and eventually merged across countries.

Surgical anatomical landmarks for arthroscopic repair of subscapularis tendon tears.

Background: Subscapularis repair has recently garnered significant interest. A thorough understanding of the tendon's anatomy is essential for precise and safe repair. Our objectives were to describe the anatomy of the subscapularis insertion, define its landmarks, and analyze nearby structures to guide arthroscopic repair. Methods: We conducted an anatomical study, dissecting 12 shoulders. We evaluated the distance from the footprint to the axillary nerve, the dimensions, and shape of the footprint, and its relationship with the humeral cartilage. Results: The distance to the axillary nerve was 32 mm (standard deviation [SD], 3.7 mm). The craniocaudal length of the footprint was 37.3 mm (SD, 4.6 mm). Its largest mediolateral thickness was 16 mm (SD, 2.2 mm), wider at the top and narrower distally. The distance between the footprint and the cartilage varied, being 3.2 mm (SD, 1.2 mm) in the upper part, 5.4 mm (SD, 1.8 mm) in the medium, and 15.9 mm (SD, 2.9 mm) in the lower part. Conclusions: When performing a repair of the subscapularis tendon, the distance to the cartilage should be carefully evaluated as it varies proximally to distally, and the shape of the footprint (wider proximally, tapered distally) should be considered for implant positioning. The distance to the axillary nerve is approximately 30 mm. Anterior visualization guarantees direct control of all landmarks and allows accurate implant positioning with safe tendon release.

High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging can predict osteoarthritic progression after medial meniscus posterior root injury: randomized in vivo experimental study in a rabbit model.

IMPORTANCE: The field of meniscal root preservation has undergone significant advancement over the past decades; however, the challenge remains to fully understand whether meniscal root repair can ultimately arrest or delay osteoarthritic changes. OBJECTIVE: To assess longitudinal changes in articular cartilage, subchondral bone, and progression to meniscal extrusion (ME) using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: Medial meniscus posterior root tear was surgically induced in 39 New Zealand white rabbits. Animals were randomly assigned into three experimental groups: partial meniscectomy after root tear (PM, n â€‹= â€‹13); root tear left in situ (CT, n â€‹= â€‹13); and transtibial root repair (RR, n â€‹= â€‹13). Contralateral limbs were used as healthy controls. High resolution 4.7 Tesla MRI of the knee joint was performed at baseline, after 2-, and 4-months of post-surgery. Cartilage thickness was calculated in medial and lateral compartments. In addition, the evaluation of ME, subchondral bone edema and healing potential after root repair were assessed too. RESULTS: Progressive cartilage thinning, ME, and subchondral bone edema were evident in all 3 study groups after 4-months of follow-up. The mean cartilage thickness in the PM group was 0.53 â€‹mm (±0.050), 0.57 â€‹mm (±0.05) in the CT group, and 0.60 â€‹mm (±0.08) in the RR group. The PM group exhibited significantly higher cartilage loss when compared to the CT and RR groups (p â€‹< â€‹0.001). Moreover, progressive ME and subchondral bone edema were associated with a more severe cartilage loss at the final follow-up. CONCLUSION: Meniscal root repair did not halt but rather reduced the progression of osteoarthritis (OA). Degenerative changes worsened at a rapid rate in the PM group compared to the RR and CT groups. Early cartilage swelling, persistent subchondral edema, and progressive ME predicted a more severe progression to knee OA in the CT and RR groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Outcomes of Arthroscopic Latarjet as a Revision Surgery After Failed Arthroscopic Bankart Repair.

BACKGROUND: The role of arthroscopic Latarjet as a revision surgery after failed arthroscopic Bankart repair has yet to be established. PURPOSE: To compare clinical outcomes, recurrences, and complication rates of arthroscopic Latarjet as a revision procedure after failed arthroscopic Bankart repair versus arthroscopic Latarjet as a primary procedure. DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of prospectively collected data of patients who were diagnosed with anterior shoulder instability and underwent arthroscopic Latarjet stabilization between 2009 and 2018. Patients were separated into 2 groups depending on whether Latarjet was performed after a previous instability surgery (revision) or as a primary surgery (primary). Rowe score, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI), Constant-Murley Shoulder Outcome (CMSO) score, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) were assessed pre- and postoperatively with a minimum 24 months of follow-up. In addition, pre- and postoperative levels of sports activity, dislocations, subluxations, and complications were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 97 patients (n = 62 revision; n = 35 primary), with a mean age of 31.0 ± 8.8 and 29.4 ± 7.6 years old in the revision and primary Latajet group, respectively, met the inclusion criteria. The mean follow-up in the revision group was 32 months (24-53) and 35.5 months (27.7-42.2) in the primary Latarjet group. No significant differences between groups were observed in Rowe score (revision = 91.4, primary = 94.1; P = .223), CMSO score (revision = 90.7, primary = 94; P = .105), and SANE (revision = 85.8, primary = 87.3; P = .683) postoperatively. However, the postoperative difference in the WOSI score between the revision and primary Latarjet groups was nearly significant (510 ± 334 vs 403 ± 343, respectively; P = .05). Four (6.4%) postoperative dislocations were reported in the revision and 1 (2.8%) in the primary Latarjet group (P = .14). Patients in the revision group had a lower return to the previous level of sports participation (P = .008) and decreased external rotation with the arm by the side compared with the primary Latarjet group (P = .000). CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic Latarjet as a revision surgery is a reasonable surgical option in failed Bankart repair cases. The decision to perform arthroscopic Latarjet stabilization as a revision surgery should not be influenced by the potential risk of future complications as it provides comparable clinical outcomes to the primary Latarjet procedure with a low postoperative recurrence rate. However, a decreased level of postoperative sports participation and external rotation with the arm by the side can be expected.

Effect of an algorithm for automatic placing of standardised test order sets on low-value appointments and attendance rates at four Spanish teaching hospitals: an interrupted time series analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Reducing backlogs for elective care is a priority for healthcare systems. We conducted an interrupted time series analysis demonstrating the effect of an algorithm for placing automatic test order sets prior to first specialist appointment on avoidable follow-up appointments and attendance rates. DESIGN: Interrupted time series analysis. SETTING: 4 academic hospitals from Madrid, Spain. PARTICIPANTS: Patients referred from primary care attending 10 033 470 outpatient appointments from 16 clinical specialties during a 6-year period (1 January 2018 to 30 June 2023). INTERVENTION: An algorithm using natural language processing was launched in May 2021. Test order sets developed for 257 presenting complaints from 16 clinical specialties were placed automatically before first specialist appointments to increase rates of diagnosis and initiation of treatment with discharge back to primary care. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes included rate of diagnosis and discharge to primary care and follow-up to first appointment index. The secondary outcome was trend in 'did not attend' rates. RESULTS: Since May 2021, a total of 1 175 814 automatic test orders have been placed. Significant changes in trend of diagnosis and discharge to primary care at first appointment (p=0.005, 95% CI 0.5 to 2.9) and 'did not attend' rates (p=0.006, 95% CI -0.1 to -0.8) and an estimated attributable reduction of 11 306 avoidable follow-up appointments per month were observed. CONCLUSION: An algorithm for placing automatic standardised test order sets can reduce low-value follow-up appointments by allowing specialists to confirm diagnoses and initiate treatment at first appointment, also leading to early discharge to primary care and a reduction in 'did not attend' rates. This initiative points to an improved process for outpatient diagnosis and treatment, delivering healthcare more effectively and efficiently.

Metaphyseal cones combined with diaphyseal impaction grafting provide good outcomes and survival in a complex revision total knee arthroplasty: a matched comparative analysis.

PURPOSE: To compare clinical and radiological outcomes, implant survivorship at a minimum of 1-year follow-up using metaphyseal trabecular cones with or without impaction grafting in a complex revision TKA. METHODS: A retrospective comparative matched analysis was performed and 15 patients who underwent revision surgery using the combination of porous trabecular metaphyseal cone and diaphyseal impaction grafting (MC-IBG) were matched with a group of 13 patients who also underwent revision surgery using metaphyseal cone (MC) without impaction grafting. All included patients presented severe bone defect (AORI 2,3) and a rotating-hinge prosthesis were implanted. RESULTS: Both groups were comparable regarding the baseline demographic and clinical data. Patients had previously undergone a mean of 4 (range, 2-12) and 3 (range, 2-5) previous procedures in the MC-IBG and MC groups, respectively. The indications for revision were aseptic loosening in 11 (73.3%) and 11 (84.6%) patients; prosthetic joint infection in 4 (26.7%) and 2 (15.4%) in the MC-IBG and MC groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in the mean postoperative Knee Society Score between the study groups (p = 0.806). Overall, 4 patients had further revision. Two patients were revised in the MC-IBG group, one patient for aseptic loosening and the second one after 2 episodes of instability. Two patients in the MC group presented prosthetic joint infection and underwent a two-stage reimplantation. No significant difference was observed between the study groups at comparison (p = 0.92). CONCLUSION: Trabecular metal cones with diaphyseal impaction grafting provide an alternative technique in a complex revision TKA surgery with early clinical and radiographic success.

Association of Instability History and Off-Track Hill-Sachs Lesions in Anterior Shoulder Instability.

Background: The glenoid track concept is now widely accepted, and its evaluation is considered essential for making decisions about surgery. Purpose: To define preoperative descriptive data and clinical and functional features in patients with anterior glenohumeral instability according to glenoid track status and to analyze the influence of off-track Hill-Sachs (HS) lesions on preoperative shoulder function. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography scans were used to measure the glenoid track. Descriptive data and preoperative objective and subjective clinical and functional features were compared between patients with on-track HS lesions versus off-track HS lesions. Multivariate regression analysis was conducted to identify potential risk factors for off-track HS lesion development. Results: A total of 235 patients (201 men, 34 women; mean age, 29.6 ± 8.6 years) were included- 134 shoulders (57%) with on-track HS lesions and 101 shoulders (43%) with off-track HS lesions. Age <20 years at first dislocation, number of dislocations, and ≥2 years between first dislocation and surgery were significantly different between the study groups (P = .005, P = .0001, and P = .01, respectively). Regarding these characteristics, the odds ratios for the risk of developing an off-track lesion were 2.67 (95% CI, 1.2-5.99)-1.2 times higher for each additional instability episode (95% CI, 1.025-1.14) and 2.42 times higher (95% CI, 1.176-4.608) for patients whose first dislocation was ≥2 years before surgery, respectively. Patients with off-track HS lesions had a significantly greater degree of instability (P = .04), worse Rowe scores (48.8 ± 15.3 vs 54.8 ± 28.3 for on-track HS lesions; P = .04), and lower Western Ontario Shoulder Instability scores (975 ± 454 vs 1179 ± 428 for on-track HS lesions; P = .01). Conclusion: Characteristics related to a history of instability (age <20 years at first instability episode, larger number of dislocations, ≥2 years between first dislocation and surgery) were found to be risk factors for the development of an off-track HS lesion in this study. Off-track lesions led to a higher degree of instability and worse objective and subjective preoperative shoulder function versus on-track HS lesions.

Effectiveness and safety of a cement-on-cement removal system for hip and knee arthroplasty revision surgery.

Cement removal during hip or knee arthroplasty revision is challenging and not exempt of complications. Cement-on-cement procedure is among techniques developed to safe removal of cement from bone, and it could be a realistic solution. This cement-on-cement devices can provide advantages in removing bone cement during hip and knee arthroplasty septic and non-septic revision surgeries, and can be regarded as an effective and safe alternative. We present our experience using the cement-on-cement technique in 34 cases between 2010 and 2021, including revision surgeries for 20 knee and 14 hip arthroplasties. In 3 out of 34 cases the technique failed, with a success of 91%. Mean surgical time was 2.77 (SD 0.93) hours and blood transfusion was required in 23 cases. Success was achieved in every aseptic case. Of all patients, 60% were septic cases. Infection was considered to be eradicated in 70% (14/20) of patients with a septic revision. Cement-on-cement is a safe and effective alternative for cement removal during hip and knee arthroplasty revision. Level of evidence: III, retrospective case series.

Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Repair Reduces but Does Not Avoid Histologic Progression of Osteoarthritis: Randomized In Vivo Experimental Study in a Rabbit Model.

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment option for meniscus root tears is still challenging, and whether the meniscus root repair ultimately can arrest or delay osteoarthritic changes is still a concern. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was 2-fold: (1) to describe and compare histopathologic findings of 3 different therapeutic options for medial meniscus posterior root tear: nonoperative management, partial meniscectomy, and meniscus root repair; and (2) to test the hypothesis that meniscus root tears treated nonoperatively predispose to a lower risk of osteoarthritic progression compared with partial meniscectomy. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Posteromedial meniscus root tears were carried out in 39 New Zealand White rabbits. Animals were randomly assigned into 3 experimental groups: partial meniscectomy after root tear (PM; n = 13), root tears treated conservatively (CT; n = 13), and transtibial root repair (RR; n = 13). Contralateral limbs were used as healthy controls. The animals were euthanized at 16 weeks postoperatively; tissue samples of femoral and tibial articular cartilage were collected and processed for macro- and microscopic assessment to detect signs of early osteoarthritis (OA). Each sample was histopathologically assessed using the Osteoarthritis Research Society International grading and staging system. RESULTS: Osteoarthritic changes were the hallmark in all 3 experimental groups. The RR group had the lowest scores for cartilage damage (mean, 2.5; range, 2-3), and the PM group exhibited higher and more severe signs of OA (mean, 16; range, 9-16) compared with the CT group (mean, 5; range, 4-6). The between-group comparison revealed significant differences, as the PM group showed a significantly higher rate of macro- and microscopic osteoarthritic changes compared with the RR (P < .001) and CT (P < .001) groups. The weightbearing area of the medial femoral condyle was the most severely affected, and tidemark disruption was evident in all tissue samples. CONCLUSION: Meniscus root repair cannot completely arrest the histopathologic progression of knee OA but leads to significantly less severe degenerative changes than partial meniscectomy and nonoperative treatment. Partial meniscectomy leads to the most severe osteoarthritic progression, while stable radial tears left in situ have lower progression compared with partial meniscectomy. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Histologic assessment is an essential tool and metric for guiding and understanding osteoarthritic features, providing insight into the disease development and progression. This study provides histopathologic evidence on osteoarthritic progression after medial meniscus posterior root repair. This knowledge can help to set more realistic expectations and can lead to the future development of augmented techniques.

The importance of a structured failure analysis in revision acromioclavicular joint surgery: A multi-rater agreement on the causes of stabilization failure from the ISAKOS shoulder committee.

BACKGROUND: Acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) stabilizations are associated with a high overall failure rate with 9.5% of these patients requiring subsequent revision surgery. Consequently, understanding the specific cause of primary ACJ stabilization failure is paramount to improving surgical decision-making in this challenging patient cohort. PURPOSE: To (1) identify risk factors and mechanisms for failure following primary arthroscopically-assisted ACJ stabilization to highlight the importance of conducting a detailed failure analysis and to (2) establish revision strategies based on real-life cases of primary failed ACJ stabilization. STUDY DESIGN: Level of evidence IV. METHODS: A survey was shared internationally among members of the International Society of Arthroscopy, Knee Surgery and Orthopaedic Sports Medicine (ISAKOS) shoulder committee. The survey contained failure analysis of 11 real-life cases of failed primary arthroscopically-assisted ACJ stabilization. For each case, a thorough patient history, standardized radiographs, and CT scans were provided. Participants were asked to give their opinion on bone tunnel placement, cause of failure (biological, technical, traumatic, or combined), the stabilization technique used, as well as give a recommendation for revision. RESULTS: Seventeen members of the ISAKOS shoulder committee completed the survey. Biological failure was considered the most common cause of failure (47.1%), followed by technical (35.3%) and traumatic (17.6%) failure. The majority deemed two modifiable factors (i.e., patient's profession and sport) as well as non-modifiable factors (i.e., patient's age and time from trauma to initial surgery) to be risk factors for failure. In 10 of 11 cases, the correct fixation device was used in the primary setting (90.9%; 52.8-82.4% agreement); however, in eight of those cases, the technique was not performed correctly (80.0%; 58.8-100% agreement). In 8 of all 11 cases, the majority recommended an arthroscopically assisted technique with graft augmentation for revision (52.9-58.8% agreement). CONCLUSION: Biological failure and technical failure are the most common reason for failure in primary ACJ stabilization followed by traumatic failure. Besides, biological failure can be triggered by technical errors such as clavicular or coracoidal tunnel misplacement. Consequently, a detailed failure analysis including preoperative CT should be conducted on the causes of primary ACJ failure, and, if possible, an arthroscopically-assisted technique with graft augmentation should be prioritized in revision ACJ surgery. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: ACJ stabilizations are associated with a high overall failure rate - potentially due to biological and technical properties. When encountering failed arthroscopically-assisted ACJ stabilization, a detailed failure analysis should be conducted on the causes of primary ACJ failure. Furthermore, an arthroscopically-assisted revision stabilization is feasible in most cases.

Does preoperative glenoid bony defect determine final coracoid graft positioning in arthroscopic Latarjet?

Background: It has been demonstrated that the accurate positioning of the graft is key to restoring shoulder stability and preventing future arthrosis development. Preoperative anteroinferior glenoid bone loss is frequently encountered when performing a Latarjet, and it has not been determined yet if the amount of bony defect can influence graft positioning. The aim of the study was to determine if a preoperative glenoid bony defect has an influence on the final coracoid graft position in the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure. Methods: Fifty-five patients who underwent the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure were included, with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. There were 51 men (92.7%). Mean age was 29.1 (SD 7.63). Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index, Rowe, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores were fulfilled. All measurements were performed by a musculoskeletal radiologist based on a multiplanar bidimensional CT scan. Dimensions of the glenoid, glenoid defect, and glenoid track were calculated. Position of the graft was evaluated in the axial (distance to glenoid surface, angulation of the graft and screws) and sagittal planes (percentage of the coracoid graft below the equator) as described by Kany et al and Barth et al respectively. Results: There was a glenoid defect in 41 patients (74.5 %). Mean width of the defect was 4.32 mm (SD 3.08) which represented 15.3% of the native glenoid surface (SD 10.8). 78.2% of the patients were offtrack preoperatively, and 11.9% remained offtrack postoperatively. The final glenoid diameter with the graft was 32.1 mm (SD 4.34). Mean distance from the graft to the glenoid at 50% height was 1.1 mm (SD 2.19 mm) and at 25% height was 1.31 mm (SD 2.05). Mean angulation of the superior and inferior screws were 26.9° (SD 8.2°) and 27.1° (SD 7.35°), respectively. In 81.8% of the cases, the graft was deemed to be flush with the glenoid. The percentage of the coracoid graft under the equator of the glenoid was 71.2 % (SD 21.8). There was not a statistically significant difference in screw angulation or graft positioning in the axial plane when comparing patients who had a glenoid defect with those who did not, or depending on the size (P > .05). Percentage of graft below the equator was, however, lower in patients without bony defect (P = .04). Conclusion: This study showed that accurate position of the coracoid graft is achieved in the presence of a glenoid bony defect. In the cases of intact glenoid, the height of the graft should be carefully evaluated.

Comprehensive arthroscopic management without axillary nerve release or subacromial decompression achieves satisfactory and durable results in young patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

PURPOSE: The comprehensive arthroscopic management (CAM) procedure is a useful joint-preserving option for young or active patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA). Our objective was to evaluate the results and prognostic factors of the CAM procedure without direct axillary nerve release or subacromial decompression. METHODS: A retrospective observational study among patients with GHOA who underwent the CAM procedure was conducted. Neither axillary nerve neurolysis nor subacromial decompression was performed. Both primary and secondary GHOA were considered; the latter was defined as a history of shoulder pathology (mainly instability or proximal humerus fracture). The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scale, Simple Shoulder Test, Visual Analogue Scale, activity level, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, EuroQol 5 Dimensions 3 Levels, Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index, and active range of motion (aROM) were analysed. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients who underwent the CAM procedure met the inclusion criteria. After a mean follow-up of 42.4 ± 22.9 months, we found improvement (p < 0.001) in all postoperative values of the different scales. The procedure increased aROM overall. Patients with arthropathy due to instability showed worse results. The rate of CAM failures, defined as conversion to shoulder arthroplasty, was 12%. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that the CAM procedure without direct axillary nerve neurolysis or subacromial decompression might be a valid alternative in active patients with advanced GHOA to improve shoulder function (aROM and scores), decrease pain, and delay arthroplasty. This technique showed good subjective functional scores, high patient satisfaction, and a low rate of complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Management of off-track Hill-Sachs lesions in anterior glenohumeral instability.

Bone loss has been identified as a risk factor for recurrent shoulder dislocations or failure after soft tissue repair. Although the range for "critical" bone loss is yet to be determined, glenoid and humeral bone defects should not be regarded as independent problems, but the interaction between them during shoulder motion should be evaluated as suggested by the glenoid track concept. The glenoid track concept is now widely accepted and considered essential for making decisions about surgery. Soft-tissue procedures usually work well in patients with on-track Hill-Sachs lesions but in off-track lesions do not. In this situation additional procedures should be performed.Different surgical options have been described to address off-track Hill-Sachs lesions, most commonly remplissage, Latarjet or free bone block procedures. Coracoid graft and free bone grafts convert the off-track Hill-Sachs lesion into on-track by lengthening the glenoid-track, whereas remplissage fill-in the humeral lesion so that it does not engage. In the setting of a Hill-Sachs lesion with little or no glenoid bone loss, remplissage has demonstrated satisfactory outcomes with a low complications and recurrence rate. Favorable results have been reported with glenoid bone grafting when managing isolated Hill-Sachs or bipolar lesions. Studies analyzing Latarjet and Eden-Hybinette procedures show that both procedures are safe and effective in the management of anterior glenohumeral instability. Attention should be paid to those patients with large bone defects not amenable to be restored with an isolated Latarjet that may be better addressed with an Eden-Hybinnete or adding a remplissage to the Latarjet procedure.

Shoulder Surgery Postoperative Immobilization: An International Survey of Shoulder Surgeons.

BACKGROUND: There is currently no consensus on immobilization protocols following shoulder surgery. The aim of this study was to establish patterns and types of sling use for various surgical procedures in the United States (US) and Europe, and to identify factors associated with the variations. METHODS: An online survey was sent to all members of the American Shoulder and Elbow Society (ASES) and European Society for Surgery of the Shoulder and Elbow (ESSSE). The survey gathered member data, including practice location and years in practice. It also obtained preferences for the type and duration of sling use after the following surgical procedures: arthroscopic Bankart repair, Latarjet, arthroscopic superior/posterosuperior rotator cuff repair (ARCR) of tears <3 cm and >3 cm, anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) and reverse TSA (rTSA), and isolated biceps tenodesis (BT). Relationships between physician location and sling type for each procedure were analyzed using Fisher's exact tests and post-hoc tests using Bonferroni-adjusted p-values. Relationships looking at years in practice and sling duration preferred were analyzed using Spearman's correlation tests. RESULTS: In total, 499 surgeons with a median of 15 years of experience (IQR = 9-25) responded, with 54.7% from the US and 45.3% from Europe. US respondents reported higher abduction pillow sling use than European respondents for the following: Bankart repair (62% vs. 15%, p < 0.0001), Latarjet (53% vs. 12%, p < 0.001), ARCR < 3 cm (80% vs. 42%, p < 0.001) and >3 cm (84% vs. 61%, p < 0.001), aTSA (50% vs. 21%, p < 0.001) and rTSA with subscapularis repair (61% vs. 22%, p < 0.001) and without subscapularis repair (57% vs. 17%, p < 0.001), and isolated BT (18% vs. 7%, p = 0.006). European respondents reported higher simple sling use than US respondents for the following: Bankart repair (74% vs. 31%, p < 0.001), Latarjet (78% vs. 44%, p < 0.001), ARCR < 3 cm (50% vs. 17%, p < 0.001) and >3 cm (34% vs. 13%, p < 0.001), and aTSA (69% vs. 41%, p < 0.001) and rTSA with subscapularis repair (70% vs. 35%, p < 0.001) and without subscapularis repair (73% vs. 39%, p < 0.001). Increasing years of experience demonstrated a negative correlation with the duration of sling use after Bankart repair (r = -0.20, p < 0.001), Latarjet (r = -0.25, p < 0.001), ARCR < 3 cm (r = -0.14, p = 0.014) and >3 cm (r = -0.20, p < 0.002), and aTSA (r = -0.37, p < 0.001), and rTSA with subscapularis repair (r = -0.10, p = 0.049) and without subscapularis repair (r = -0.19, p = 0.022. Thus, the more experienced surgeons tended to recommend shorter durations of post-operative sling use. US surgeons reported longer post-operative sling durations for Bankart repair (4.8 vs. 4.1 weeks, p < 0.001), Latarjet (4.6 vs. 3.6 weeks, p < 0.001), ARCR < 3 cm (5.2 vs. 4.5 weeks p < 0.001) and >3 cm (5.9 vs. 5.1 weeks, p < 0.001), aTSA (4.9 vs. 4.3 weeks, p < 0.001), rTSR without subscapularis repair (4.0 vs. 3.6 weeks, p = 0.031), and isolated BT (3.7 vs. 3.3 weeks, p = 0.012) than Europe respondents. No significant differences between regions within the US and Europe were demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable variation in the immobilization advocated by surgeons, with geographic location and years of clinical experience influencing patterns of sling use. Future work is required to establish the most clinically beneficial protocols for immobilization following shoulder surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Recurrence of instability after Latarjet procedure: causes, results and treatment algorithm.

Latarjet modifies the anatomy of the shoulder, and subsequent revision surgery is challenging. It is mandatory to determine the cause of recurrence in order to select the best treatment option. A CT scan is needed to measure glenoid track and evaluate coracoid graft status: position, degree of consolidation, and osteolysis. Conservative management can be advocated in selected patients in whom the instability level does not interfere with the activities they wish to perform. Surgical treatment is based on the glenoid track measurement and coracoid graft suitability. The coracoid graft is considered suitable if it preserves the conjoint tendon insertion, does not show osteolysis, and is large enough to reconstruct the glenoid surface. Adding a remplissage is recommended for those cases with a coracoid graft insufficient to convert large off-track Hill-Sachs lesions into on-track. If the coracoid graft is suitable to reconstruct bone defects in terms of size and viability but is poorly positioned or avulsed, graft repositioning can be a valid option. In patients with unsuitable coracoid bone graft, free bone graft is the revision technique of choice. The size of the graft should be large enough to restore the glenoid surface and to convert any off-track Hill-Sachs lesion into on-track. There is a small group of patients in whom bone defects were properly addressed but Latarjet failed due to hyperlaxity or poor soft tissue quality. Extraarticular capsular reinforcement is suggested in this population.

Prognostic Factors and Midterm Clinical Outcome of Transtibial Pullout and Partial Meniscectomy for Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears in Middle-Aged Patients.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare clinical and radiological outcomes of transtibial pullout technique and partial meniscectomy, and to establish prognostic factors in middle-aged patients with mild knee osteoarthritis. Methods: A comparative case-control analysis was conducted. 65 patients between 40 and 60 years of age were included into two groups: 30 patients who underwent transtibial pullout technique (group 1) and 35 patients who underwent partial meniscectomy (group 2). Mean follow-up was set at 27.2 months. Primary clinical outcomes included Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and Lysholm Knee Questionnare. Preoperative MRI and intraoperative arthroscopic findings were recorded. The correlation between these findings and patient-reported subjective outcome were assessed. Results: The transtibial pullout group exhibited significantly greater improvement in clinical outcomes. A univariate model revealed that the presence of preoperative meniscal extrusion, body mass index (> 30), osteochondral defect, and female gender were predictors of poor clinical outcome. Multivariate regression analysis showed meniscal extrusion and osteochondral defect as significant prognostic factors for both study groups. Conclusion: Medial meniscus root repair leads to significantly improved clinical outcomes compared to partial meniscectomy in middle-aged patients with mild knee osteoarthritis. Presence of meniscal extrusion, osteochondral defect, BMI > 30, and female gender were deemed as predictors of poor postoperative patient-reported outcome. Level of Evidence: III therapeutic case-control study.

Developing an experimental model of early knee osteoarthritis after medial meniscus posterior root release: an in vivo study.

PURPOSE: To develop a predictable and reproducible model of knee osteoarthritis after medial meniscus posterior root release. METHODS: Posteromedial meniscal root tears were created in 12 White New Zealand rabbit knees. The contralateral limbs were used as healthy controls. The animals were euthanized at 16 weeks postoperatively; tissue samples of femoral and tibial articular cartilage were collected and processed for macro and microscopic analyses to detect signs of early degeneration. Clinical evaluation of the weight-bearing status on the affected knee was conducted at 0-, 4-, 8-, and 16-weeks postoperatively. RESULTS: Early and severe osteoarthritic changes were the hallmark and the main findings after 16-weeks post-surgery. Macroscopically, extensive osteoarthritic changes were observed across the femoral condyle and tibial plateau. Microscopic finding included ulcerations, fissures, fibrillations, pitting, and loss of the superficial layer. Cellularity was diminished, the normal pattern of distribution in columns was lost, and subchondral bone exposure was also evident. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes a novel model of knee osteoarthritis that may guide the development of tailored interventions to delay or prevent knee osteoarthritis. This knowledge could shift the current treatment paradigm toward more conservative and knee salvageable treatment options and increase surgeons' awareness of this injury pattern. Such considerations may have a positive impact on clinical decision-making and subsequent patient-reported clinical outcomes. DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

The Cartilage Wear Index: a new evaluation method to improve patient selection in surgical treatment of recurrent posterior glenohumeral instability.

Background: The purpose of this study was to validate glenoid cartilage lesions as a negative prognostic factor and to define a new image-based preoperative evaluation method to identify surgical candidates for arthroscopic labral refixation with suture anchors in posterior shoulder instability. Methods: Twenty-six patients who underwent arthroscopic posterior labral repair for shoulder instability were evaluated. Only patients with structural dynamic posterior instability were included. We evaluated on preoperative magnetic resonance arthrogram: glenoid version, humeral head subluxation, type of capsular insertion, and the cartilage lesions using the new Cartilage Wear Index (CWI). Two subgroups were analyzed with regard to the preoperative CWI and shoulder outcome scores: Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). Results: The median age at operation was 28 (interquartile range = 21-33) years. Median overall postoperative outcome assessment demonstrated a SANE of 90 and a WOSI of 385. The median CWI was 1.02. Subgroup analysis revealed worse median WOSI and SANE scores in patients with a CWI >1.02 and a strong correlation between a high preoperative CWI and a higher postoperative WOSI score (R = 0.58; P = .038). Conclusion: The CWI can be useful to identify patients who might obtain better outcomes when treated with arthroscopic labral repair in posterior shoulder instability.

Reliable interobserver and intraobserver agreement of the International Society of Arthroscopy, Knee Surgery and Orthopaedic Sports Medicine (ISAKOS) classification system of rotator cuff tears.

OBJECTIVE: The ISAKOS Shoulder Committee developed a new comprehensive classification system aimed to describe all rotator cuff tears. The five characteristics of the tears included are pattern (P), extension (E), fatty atrophy (A), retraction (R), and location (L), conforming to the acronym "PEARL." The objective of this study is to assess if the ISAKOS Rotator Cuff Tear Classification System is reliable by measuring the intraobserver and interobserver multirater reliability. METHODS: Arthroscopic videos of 36 rotator cuff tears, including tears of varying sizes and configurations, were evaluated twice by four surgeons from different continents blinded to tear type. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability was measured using multirater and intraobserver Kappa coefficients. RESULTS: Intraobserver reliability: An almost perfect agreement for "location" (κ = 0.98), substantial agreement for "extension" (κ = 0.73) were obtained for mean intrarater kappa, lower κ agreement for "pattern" (κ = 0.58), and relatively high agreement of 0.79 for "retraction." Every characteristic of "location" had an almost perfect agreement among the surgeons (κ = 0.91). Intrarrater reliability: In the partial-thickness posterosuperior tears "location," there was good agreement in tears involving less than 50% of the tendon (κ = 0.74) and moderate in those deeper than 50% of the tendon thickness (κ = 0.58). "Extension" in full-thickness posterosuperior RCT achieved moderate agreement. Within the anterior subscapularis tears, we have a substantial agreement in Lafosse´s Type 1 (κ = 0.73), moderate in Types 2 and 3 (κ = 0.45 and κ = 0.46) and slight agreement in Type 4 (κ = 0.06). The overall kappa summarizing all categories indicated moderate agreement (κ = 0.52). The articular pattern in the partial-thickness posterosuperior RCT "location" had a perfect kappa of 1, while the bursal pattern showed an almost complete agreement (κ = 0.87). In the full-thickness posterosuperior RCTs, we observed fair agreement in C, U, and reverse L configurations and slight agreement in L pattern (κ = 0.18). The overall kappa is 0.44 with a confidence interval of 0.41-0.47. There was substantial agreement in every category and the overall kappa for "retraction" (k = 0.70). CONCLUSION: ISAKOS rotator cuff tear classification system provides sufficient interobserver reliability for communicating among surgeons and for pooling of data from clinical studies. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.